2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (Appeal) was right in ignoring the fact ...
“1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and endorsed by the CIT (A) for ...
The adjudicating officer concluded that the company and its directors had violated the provisions of Section 134 (1), ...
International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) has released a consultation paper outlining principles to mitigate ...
A return of allotment of securities under section 42 shall be filed with the Registrar within fifteen days of allotment in ...
It is noticed that the director’s DIN was not mentioned in the signed financial statements attached with Form AOC-4 for the ...
(1) Whenever a company having a share capital makes any allotment of its securities, the company shall, within thirty days ...
Failure to file Form MGT-14 for board resolutions approving financial statements: MCA imposes Penalty ...
The Assessee challenged the penalty Imposed by National Faceless Appellate Centre U/S. 271B of the I.T Act for the A.Y ...
Producing An Accused Before Magistrate Beyond 24 Hrs Without Obtaining Any Transit Warrant Is Violative Of Article 22 (2) Of Constitution: Telangana HC ...
In the case of Mohammed Kaleem vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore imposed a ₹1000 fine on the taxpayer for failing to appear during the assessment proceedings and the ...
ITO, the ITAT Bangalore addressed a 69-day delay in the filing of an appeal for the assessment year 2010-11. The delay was initially deemed unjustifiable by the CIT(A), leading to the dismissal of the ...